laws

overview

Oil and gas development is regulated by all levels of government -- Federal, State, and local. Some statutes deal with oil and gas operations directly, while others are more generally concerned with protecting human health, air, land, wildlife, water or other resources and incidentally apply to oil and gas. After laws are passed by Congress or a state legislature, it is the task of an administrative agency such as the Bureau of Land Management, the Environmental Protection Agency, or a state agency or commission, like the Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission, to issue regulations, further defining, and consistent with, the original law. Beyond their regulations (also called rules), the agencies might also issue policy or guidance documents to further explain the law. At the local government level, the law itself, usually called an ordinance, is the most detailed provision of law.

Which laws are applicable to a particular development depends in part on who owns the land and who owns the minerals. For federal lands or minerals, the process can involve all three levels of government. For private or state lands and minerals, the process is mostly state and local, although all development needs to comply with the national environmental laws like the Clean Air Act and Clean Water Act. For additional information on the Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, and other laws applicable to oil and gas development, go to the index page of the Federal Laws Section on the Red Lodge Clearinghouse website and choose a topic.

Where there is a “split estate” -- different parties owning the surface of the land and its minerals -- regulation can be even more complex. Confusion and frustration can also arise where more than one level of government claims jurisdiction. When Federal, state, and local governments all try to regulate development and their laws conflict with one another, the doctrine of preemption dictates that the federal laws will prevail over conflicting state or local laws, and that state laws will prevail over conflicting local laws. While this hierarchy may appear clear-cut, it is not always clear if there is an actual conflict of law that would trigger preemption.

Special Topics

The staff of the Intermountain Oil and Gas BMP Project is available to help with  specific research topics. After helping with a research request, we will make the 
research report publicly available.

U.S. Chemical Safety Board: Public Safety

The Summary Comparison of Public Safety Provisions is a collection of local and  state regulations in the five-state area relating to site security and fencing  requirements during oil and gas development. The comparison report was created in an effort to assemble and compare a range of public safety  provisions from local and state governments. Often where state regulations do not exist, local provisions can be found. The project was initiated by a request from the U.S. Chemical Safety Board.

Colorado Rulemaking Stakeholder Meetings

The following five-state comparisons of oil and gas regulatory provisions were created by UNiversity of Colorado Law student volunteers in conjunction with a 2009 Colorado rulemaking process.  These summaries were designed to provide background information for post-rulemaking stakeholder meetings.

Summary comparison of wildlife provisions
Summary comparison of riparian provisions
Summary comparison of reclamation provisions
Summary comparison of setback provisions

How do Best Management Practices fit into “Law”?

“Best management practices (BMPs) are state-of-the-art mitigation measures applied on a site-specific basis to reduce, prevent, or avoid adverse environmental or social impacts.”
- Bureau of Land Management BMP website

Many people associated with oil and gas development think of BMPs as strictly voluntary practices. In the Intermountain Oil and Gas BMP Project Database, we have taken a more expansive view of BMPs, in part because what is voluntary today may be required tomorrow or may change from one jurisdiction to another. Consequently, we have included both voluntary and required practices in our database. We designate BMPs as either “Required” or “Recommended” in the database and provide our rationale for this designation in our bibliography.

Only a small percentage of BMPs are designated as “required” practices because they are codified in law or regulation. Many more BMPs are required by regulatory agencies but not through statute or regulation. For example, the may be required BMPs because they are stipulations on leases, conditions of approval on permits, or otherwise agreed to by industry as mitigation during the environmental impact analysis process. Still more BMPs are designated in the BMP Database as “Recommended” -- simply voluntary practices being implemented by industry or recommended by various entities to minimize the impacts of development.

To learn more . . .

About the federal, state, and local regulation of oil and gas extraction, please see Federal, State and Local Regulations or Split Estates on the Oil and Gas Resource Development page of the Red Lodge Clearinghouse website.

For an in-depth view of the preemption issue from a Colorado local government perspective, see the article Preemption Is Not Assumed.

Add Information

If you have or think we should have additional information for any of our laws pages, please contact us. Go to ADD INFO.

Warning: We do our best to keep this section current, but please check with the appropriate jurisdiction for the final word on current laws and regulations!