BMP of Oil and Gas Development

Wildlife

Wildlife Basics

In many ways, wildlife management is primarily a state function. That said, the protection of wildlife – game, non-game and sensitive species – and the protection and restoration of wildlife habitat in the Intermountain West is a complex endeavor. The development of oil and gas resources on federal, state and private lands requires adherence to both federal and state law and requires the cooperation of federal, state, and local governments as well as industry, conservation groups, landowners and many interested citizens. The resources on this web page link to agencies and organizations working to protect wildlife in the Intermountain West and highlight some of the most controversial issues related to development in the region.

Species of Special Concern

Sage Grouse

For an in-depth look at sage grouse species, habitat requirements, and landscape management for sage grouse see the plans of the Western Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies, individual state agencies, and collaborative working groups. Resources on these links discuss effects of oil and gas development on grouse, strategies and practices for habitat management within oil and gas fields, and monitoring practices.

Western Association of Fish and Wildlife

Greater Sage-Grouse Comprehensive Conservation Strategy

Colorado

Greater and Gunnison Sage Grouse Conservation Plans

Wyoming

Wyoming Game and Fish Department

Greater Sage Grouse Management Plan

Keeping Birds in the Sagebrush Sea

Wyoming Sage-Grouse Research Reports

Petroleum Association of Wyoming - Sage Grouse Management

Greater sage-grouse population response to natural gas field development in western Wyoming

Sage Grouse Winter Habitat Selection and Energy Development in the Powder River Basin: Completion Report

Sage-grouse Population Response to Coal-bed Natural Gas Development in the Powder River Basin: Interim Progress Report on Region-wide Lek-count Analyses

Biodiversity Conservation Alliance - Additional Sage Grouse Studies

Western North America

Adaptive management of prairie grouse: How do we get there?

Development in Western North America: Effects on Sagebrush Steppe Avifauna with Particular Emphasis on Sage-grouse

How Many is Too Many: A Review of Road Density Thresholds for Wildlife

Threatened and Endangered Species

The Endangered Species Act (ESA) is a powerful federal law that regulates management of threatened and endangered wildlife species through critical habitat designations and strict controls on activities that could cause harm to protected species. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service administers the ESA as it applies to both private and public entities, but state wildlife agencies play a cooperative role in the listing and management of threatened and endangered species. For background information on the ESA, see the Red Lodge Clearinghouse Website: LAWS: Endangered Species Act.

State Species of Concern

States also designate species of state concern and develop management strategies for those species to prevent a need for federal listing as threatened or endangered. See the following links for information on state species of concern.

Colorado

Colorado Division of Wildlife, Species of Concern

Colorado Natural Heritage Program

Montana

Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks - Species of Concern

Montana Natural Heritage Program

New Mexico

New Mexico Wildlife Conservation - Species of Concern (BISON-M)

Oil and Gas Development Guidelines, Conserving New Mexico’s Wildlife Habitats and Wildlife

Natural Heritage New Mexico

Utah

Utah Conservation Data Center

Wyoming

Wyoming Game and Fish - Nongame Species of Special Concern

Wyoming Natural Diversity Database

What Do We Know?

State wildlife agencies, academics, industry and conservation groups all want to understand the impact of development – including oil and gas development – on wildlife populations. Many entities are sponsoring and participating in research projects and wildlife monitoring efforts throughout the Intermountain West. The following are links to agency web sites and to a small sampling of that research. Please help us bring more of this research to our web site community. Click the ABOUT US button to contribute information for this section.

General

Research and Publications, Our Public Lands, National Wildlife Federation

Colorado

Colorado Division of Wildlife Research

Literature Review of Oil and Natural Gas Development Impacts on Prairie Grouse

Montana

Montana Division of Fish, Wildlife, and Parks

Montana Comprehensive Wildlife Strategy

Montana Petroleum Association – Wildlife Documents

New Mexico

New Mexico Energy, Minerals, and Natural Resources Department – Land Conservation, Habitat Corridors and Wildlife Adaptations

New Mexico Game and Fish

Conservation webpage - includes reports on various issues

Habitat Fragmentation and the Effects of Roads on Wildlife and Habitats

Utah

Great Basin Research Center

Wyoming

Wyoming Game and Fish Department

Wyoming Game and Fish Department Homepage

Recommendations for Development of Oil and Gas Resources within Crucial and Important Wildlife Habitats

Wyoming Big Game Habitat Reports

Wyoming Landscape Conservation Initiative

Wyoming Wildlife Federation: Oil and Gas Development Research and Publications.

Western Ecosystems Technology Incorporated (WEST Inc). is a private environmental consulting company that performs development impact studies, primarily in Wyoming, for both the federal government and private industry.

Mule deer and pronghorn migration in western Wyoming

Sublette Mule Deer Study (Phase II) Final Report

Final Report for the Atlantic Rim Mule Deer Study

Seasonal distribution and habitat use patterns of elk in the Jack Morrow Hills Planning Area

Winter habitat selection of mule deer before and during development of a natural gas field

Big Game Speciesx

Effects of Roads on Elk: Implications for Management in Forested Ecosystems

Wyoming Pronghorn Working Group

Western Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies Mule Deer Working Group: Mule Deer in the West - Changing Landscapes Changing Perspectives.

Lesser Prairie Chickens and Wild Turkey

Ecology and Management of the Lesser Prairie Chicken

The Relationship of Rio Grande Wild Turkey Distributions to Roads

Grizzly Bear

Analysis of Road Densities in Selected Grizzly Bear Management Units in the Northern Rockies

Review of Oil and Gas Exploitation Impacts on Grizzly Bears

Fish

Wild Fish Habitat Initiative

Effects of Coalbed Methane Development on Great Plains Fish Assemblages

The Landscape Approach

Understanding and protecting resources on a landscape scale is also important to maintaining the biodiversity and unique character of the Intermountain West. What does it mean to work at a landscape scale and why is it important? What is habitat fragmentation and how can it be minimized in responsible oil and gas development? See the following resources to help answer these questions:

Wyoming Landscape Conservation Initiative (WLCI)

The WLCI is a multi-partner, long-term, science-based program to assess, monitor, and enhance aquatic and terrestrial habitats at a landscape scale in southwest Wyoming, while facilitating responsible development through local collaboration and partnerships.

The Nature Conservancy - Continental Divide-Creston Project

BP is consulting with The Nature Conservancy to manage impacts of the Continental Divide-Crestone Project near Wamsutter Wyoming.

Western Governor’s Association - Wildlife Corridors Initiative

The Wildlife Corridors Initiative is a multi-state and collaborative effort to improve knowledge of and management for migratory corridors and crucial habitat.

Wildlife Mitigation Plans

Colorado Wildlife Mitigation Plans mapIn Colorado, energy companies have the option to voluntarily work with the Colorado Division of Wildlife (CDOW) to create a Wildlife Mitigation Plan (WMP). In developing the WMP, energy companies agree to Best Managment Practices (BMPs) and other measures that are expected to help “avoid, minimize, and mitigate impacts from oil and gas activities to wildlife.” Species of concern in the plans will vary by location, but are likely to include elk, deer, raptors, sage grouse, and cutthroat trout. A WMP benefits wildlife and the CDOW as the plan is effective in long term wildlife planning on a landscape scale.  For energy companies, having a plan in place eliminates the need to consult on mitigation measures with CDOW and other parties when submitting individual drilling permit applications.

In the plan, energy companies may also commit to perform or fund off-site mitigation to address impacts that cannot be avoided or minimized as well as fund CDOW research to learn how to better manage wildlife. Because a WMP is specific to a certain energy company, BMPs and other measures agreed to in the plan will vary for each WMP.  By late 2010, over 320,000 acres in western Colorado were covered in WMPs developed with seven companies.

For a summary of WMPs in western Colorado, see the WMP status report.


Some Best Management Practices included in Wildlife Mitigation Plans:

Rule 1202 d:
Consultation under Rule 306.c shall not be required if: . . . (2) The Colorado Division of Wildlife has previously approved, in writing, a wildlife mitigation plan or other wildlife protection or conservation plan that remains in effect for the area that includes the proposed new oil and gas location and the oil and gas location is in compliance with such plan
  • Locate roads as far from riparian areas and bottoms of drainages as possible and outside riparian habitat
  • Manage traffic
  • Use temporary living camps to house the resources needed to support the drilling operations
  • Avoid or attempt to avoid drilling

 

 

 

Intermountain Oil & Gas
BMP