University of Colorado at Boulder
BMP of Oil and Gas Development

View BMP

BMP ID: 6187
Title: Thermal Treatment Technologies
Text: "Thermal technologies use high temperatures to reclaim or destroy hydrocarbon-contaminated material [in drill cuttings]. Thermal treatment is the most efficient treatment for destroying organics, and it also reduces the volume and mobility of inorganics such as metals and salts (Bansal and Sugiarto 1999). [see supplemental document attached] Additional treatment may be necessary for metals and salts, depending on the final fate of the wastes. Waste streams high in hydrocarbons (typically 10 to 40%), like oil-based mud, are good candidates for thermal treatment technology. Thermal treatment can be an interim process to reduce toxicity and volume and prepare a waste stream for further treatment or disposal (e.g., landfill, land farming, land spreading), or it can be a final treatment process resulting in inert solids, water, and recovered base fluids."
Source Publication Name: Drilling Waste Management Information System
Citation Section: Technology Descriptions: Fact Sheet - Thermal Treatment Technologies
Citation Page:
Supplemental Documents: Exploration and Production Operations - Waste Management A Comparative Overview: US and Indonesia Cases
Usage Type: Recommended
Timing: • Drilling
Oil / Gas Field:  
Surface Ownership: • Federal
• State
• Private
Mineral Ownership: • Federal
• State
• Private
Primary Contact: Argonne National Laboratory
Phone:     Alt. Phone:
Fax:     E-mail: 
Alternate Contact: National Energy Technology Laboratory
Phone:     Alt. Phone:
Fax:     E-mail: 
Categories: Land Surface Disturbance
Location: General / Federal
Species:
Vegetation Types:
General Comments:
Cost-Benefit Analysis: “Costs for thermal treatment range from $75 to $150/ton, with labor being a large component (Bansal and Sugiarto 1999). [see supplemental document attached] The volumes of oily waste from a single operator may not be high enough to justify continuous operation of a thermal treatment process, but contract operation of a centrally located facility that manages waste from multiple area operators can be a cost-effective alternative.”
BMP Efficacy:
Date Entered: 2009-08-19 12:09 UTC
Last Updated: 2011-07-17 13:29 UTC